• Home
  • Kaleidoscope
    • Campus
    • City
    • Arts and Culture
    • Sports
    • Opinion
    • Staff
  • UABtv
  • Aura
    • Latest
    • Submissions
    • Aura Archives
  • SparkLab
  • Podcasts
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending
  • City Council approves incentives to preserve Birmingham’s historic buildings
  • Artist Spotlight: Taylor Lyon
  • Artist Spotlight: Kaitlyn Avery & Rich Glinnen
  • Weekly Wednesday Playlist: Everything’s Okay
  • Black babies are disproportionately affected by infant mortality
  • Interview with Anna Ulrey, Incoming Editor-in-Chief of Aura Literary Arts Review
  • Inside the life of a tattoo artist
  • Artist Spotlight: Denis Bell & Angelina Scuffle
Facebook LinkedIn RSS
UAB Blazer Media Co.
  • Home
  • Kaleidoscope
    • Campus
    • City
    • Arts and Culture
    • Sports
    • Opinion
    • Staff
  • UABtv
  • Aura
    • Latest
    • Submissions
    • Aura Archives
  • SparkLab
  • Podcasts
UAB Blazer Media Co.
You are at:Home»Kaleidoscope»Arts and Culture»Review: ‘The Last Duel’ is a mess worth seeing

Review: ‘The Last Duel’ is a mess worth seeing

0
By Riley Humphrey on October 21, 2021 Arts and Culture, Kaleidoscope
70%
70%

Ridley Scott tells a thrilling, haunting, and relevant historical tale. But with every set of incredible moments, there’s a confusing mistake. This is a polarizing movie, but one that everyone should see at least once.

  • Kaleidoscope Rating
    7
  • User Ratings (1 Votes)
    8.8

“This is based on a true story” is a phrase that flashes across movie screens several times a year, usually around award season. But never has a movie gotten so much out of its “true story” as “The Last Duel” has.

Taking place in medieval France, the film follows a hotheaded knight Jean de Carrouges (Matt Damon) and squire Jacques Le Gris (Adam Driver), who is the favorite of the powerful Count Pierre d’Alençon (Ben Affleck). While initially friends, de Carrouges challenges his Le Gris to a duel after his wife Marguerite (Jodie Comer) accuses the squire of raping her.

This isn’t a single true story, but a story told in three parts from three perspectives, each of which is believed to be true by its respective storyteller. It’s a well-worn story structure, but I feel as if it works better in a historical context, since history is often vague and contradictory. Like all great historical films, this doesn’t just show you another time and place, but also how it relates to our modern lives.

The characters move and sound like people you might know. Their beliefs are very different from ours, but you understand why they might hold them. Importantly, the issues in their lives are still being grappled with today. These issues include the roles of gender in society and the strange crossroads where property, marriage and sex converge.

During the de Carrouges and Le Gris segments, they speak of honor and justice. They fight in battles across Europe, attend feasts and attempt to boost the status of their families. But from Marguerite’s perspective, things become petty and vain. Both men seem obsessed with how the assault has affected them and bruised their pride. Marguerite has very little agency in the proceedings, only there to be asked invasive questions or doubted by those closest to her. As the climactic duel gets closer, you start to realize that no real justice is going to be served. Men are fools, the truth is fleeting and everyone is the hero of their own story.

That thematic core is powerful, and the movie has many other great aspects, but it’s also incredibly uneven. Despite the budget and technical artistry, the cinematography is unimpressive (think an above-average HBO show). The biggest problems all relate to its editing. Repeating parts of the story to show it from different perspectives is good, but the editors occasionally leave in small, unimportant segments that add nothing with each repeat. Ten minutes could have been cut with no effect.

I also wish they had cut out the start of the third act. After effectively communicating the #MeToo-tinged themes throughout the first half, the movie suddenly begins to panic. Almost as if afraid it hasn’t done a

good enough job, it starts throwing out anachronistic buzzwords and ruining the haunting ambiguity of the earlier chapters. Weirdest of all, it tries to add random bits of black comedy.

The ending is the chief offender here. It nearly closes on a devastating note, with a powerful final shot and implications that would have left me thinking for days … only to reverse course in the last 30 seconds and make a baffling Hail-Mary attempt at a happy ending. It nearly fumbles the goodwill that it had built accrued up to that point. It’s a testament to the movie’s strengths that I ultimately didn’t care.

Photo courtesy of 20th Century Fox Studios

And speaking of strengths, Scott directs medieval action like he was born to do it. Each battle is short but stunning, aided by incredible sound design and lavish effects that immersed me completely. Horses thunder through the mud, armor clanks and blades sing.

The actual final duel is one of the highlights of Ridley Scott’s career and undoubtedly is one of the best action sequences of the past few years. It’s brutal, with a level of genuine savagery you almost never see on-screen. Scott wisely chose to direct it like a horror/thriller scene and not like a straightforward action scene, and it left me wincing after each exchange. On an emotional level, you get the feeling that everyone involved genuinely believes they’re in the right.

It’s a shame that this enthusiastic recommendation comes with an asterisk, because “The Last Duel” is a movie that everyone should see. After all, a messy but interesting film beats a safe, uninteresting one. With better editing, this could easily be a classic. But for now, it’s just very good. It’s certainly another win for Ridley Scott. I just wish the victory was a little cleaner.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Riley Humphrey

Related Posts

City Council approves incentives to preserve Birmingham’s historic buildings

Weekly Wednesday Playlist: Everything’s Okay

Black babies are disproportionately affected by infant mortality

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Follow UAB Student Media
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
Latest Blazer Media Posts
May 11, 2022

City Council approves incentives to preserve Birmingham’s historic buildings

May 4, 2022

Artist Spotlight: Taylor Lyon

April 28, 2022

Artist Spotlight: Kaitlyn Avery & Rich Glinnen

April 28, 2022

Weekly Wednesday Playlist: Everything’s Okay

April 28, 2022

Black babies are disproportionately affected by infant mortality

Recent Comments
  • Alex Yates on Independent Bookstores in Alabama
  • Caleb Wood on Independent Bookstores in Alabama
  • Blessphemy Cover Solo on Aura’s “Battle Royale” Spoken Word Competition Hits UAB Stage
  • lawtrack.com on Aura’s “Battle Royale” Spoken Word Competition Hits UAB Stage
  • Alana on Aura’s “Battle Royale” Spoken Word Competition Hits UAB Stage
About

UAB Blazer Media

UAB Student Media is the home of the University of Alabama at Birmingham’s student-run media outlets. They include Kaleidoscope , an award-winning weekly newspaper; BlazeRadio, our podcast network; Aura, a much-heralded literary arts magazine; and UABtv, original, web-based video programming.

UAB students operate all media. The articles, posts, newscasts and opinions are solely those of its student writers, producers, editors, deejays, etc. and do not reflect that of the university, its administrators or the Student Media advisors.

Popular Posts
January 31, 2020

Aura’s “Battle Royale” Spoken Word Competition Hits UAB Stage

October 22, 2021

Independent Bookstores in Alabama

February 4, 2020

Johnson’s jersey to be retired

Copyright © 2014 ThemeSphere. Powered by WordPress.
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact
Copyright © 2014 ThemeSphere. Powered by WordPress.
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.